USPTO serial 77468162
SSR SUPER SLIP RESISTANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3904711Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2011
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SSR SUPER SLIP RESISTANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
CHUNG CHEONG NAM-DO, KR
Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
CHUNG CHEONG NAM-DO, KR
Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
CHUNG CHEONG NAM-DO, KR
Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shoes; iron fittings for shoes; welts for shoes; beach shoes; bath sandals; bath slippers; boots for sports; gymnastic shoes, half-boots; heelpieces for shoes; heels; lace boots; leather shoes; leather slippers; mules in the nature of footwear; clogs in the nature of footwear; boot uppers; boots; heelpieces for boots; iron fittings for boots; non-slipping devices for boots, namely, rubber soles; ski boots; welts for boots; esparto shoes or sandals; fittings of metal for shoes and boots; football boots; studs for football boots; sports shoes; football shoes; foot muffs not electrically heated; footwear; tips for footwear; footwear uppers; backless shoes; shoes made of rubber; overshoes; deck shoes; hiking boots; hiking shoes; rock-climbing shoes; motorcycle boots; ballet slippers; ballet shoes; boxing shoes; volleyball shoes; cleats for attachment to sports shoes; cycling shoes; track shoes; track spikes in the nature of footwear; racing flats in the nature of shoes; tennis shoes; sneakers in the nature of footwear; shoes made of vinyl; wedge shoes; wooden-soled shoes; wooden-soled sandals; inserts in the nature of insertable slip-resistant interior liners for footwear; flip-flops in the nature of footwear; straw sandals; wedge sandals; thong sandals; field hockey shoes; handball shoes; lacrosse shoes; basketball shoes; wrestling shoes; moccassins in the nature of footwear; patent leather shoes; saddle shoes; work boots; spandex shoes; riding shoes; anti-slip soles for footwear; baseball shoes; bowling shoes; laced boots; non-slipping devices for shoes; non-slipping devices for sandals; removable soles for boots or shoes; strap-on soles for boots or shoes; wading boots; soccer cleats; steel-toe boots; boots in the nature of shoes; soles for footwear; sports boots; sandals; uppers for footwear; wooden shoes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 22, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SSR SUPER SLIP RESISTANT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |