USPTO serial 77468202
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Natu J. Patel
Natu J. Patel The Patel Law Firm, P.C.22952 Mill Creek DriveLaguna Hills, CA 92653UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail and wholesale distributorship of tobacco, pipe tobacco, smoking tobacco, flavored tobacco, molasses tobacco, and charcoal; Retail and wholesale distributorship of hookahs and accessories | ACTIVE | Jan 11, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 11, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 18, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 18, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 14, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 9, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 9, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |