Drawing for XINERGY

USPTO serial 77469005

XINERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XINERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles W. Kite

Charles W. Kite Xinergy Corporation8351 E WALKER SPRINGS ROADSUITE 202KNOXVILLE, TN 37923-3143

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Mining extractionACTIVEMar 1, 2008
040Material processing, namely, obtaining metals from native earth materialsACTIVEMar 1, 2008
042Mining exploration and mineral exploration servicesACTIVEMar 1, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2009PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 17, 2009MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 16, 2009RGOAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION—
Apr 13, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 10, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 13, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance