USPTO serial 77469588
MY STROKE OF INSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MY STROKE OF INSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ellen W. Stiefler
ELLEN W. STIEFLER STIEFLER LAW GROUP, PC3525 DEL MAR HEIGHTS RD STE 111SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-2122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing workshops, classes, seminars, coaching, training, mentoring, conferences, training via conference calls, tele-seminars, lectures, courses, conducting programs, motivational and educational speakers, conducting and organizing on-line exhibitions, on-line displays, and on-line interactive exhibits, and arranging and conducting meetings in the field of thinking, reasoning, acquiring and applying knowledge, the brain, the mind, neurology, health, wellness, spirituality, rehabilitation, and medicine; Educational services, namely, conducting workshops, classes, seminars, coaching, training, mentoring, conferences, training via conference calls, tele-seminars, lectures, courses, conducting programs, motivational and educational speakers, conducting and organizing on-line exhibitions, on-line displays, and on-line interactive exhibits, and arranging and conducting meetings in the field of thinking, reasoning, acquiring and applying knowledge, the brain, the mind, neurology, health, wellness, spirituality, rehabilitation, and medicine and distribution of course material in connection therewith; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers; Meeting and seminar arranging; Arranging professional workshop and training courses; Organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; Educational demonstrations; Publication of printed matter; Publishing of electronic publications; On-line publication of electronic books, electronic magazines, newsletters, journals, periodicals, and other electronic publications; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring thinking, reasoning, acquiring and applying knowledge, the brain, the mind, neurology, health, wellness, spirituality, rehabilitation, and medicine; On-line library services, namely, providing electronic library services which feature newspapers, magazines, photographs and pictures via an on-line computer network; Educational and entertainment services, namely, a continuing program about thinking, reasoning, acquiring and applying knowledge, the brain, the mind, neurology, health, wellness, spirituality, rehabilitation, and medicine accessible by radio, television, satellite, audio, video and computer networks; Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of thinking, reasoning, acquiring and applying knowledge, the brain, the mind, neurology, health, wellness, spirituality, rehabilitation, and medicine; Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-going radio program in the field of thinking, reasoning, acquiring and applying knowledge, the brain, the mind, neurology, health, wellness, spirituality, rehabilitation, and medicine; Entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of thinking, reasoning, acquiring and applying knowledge, the brain, the mind, neurology, health, wellness, spirituality, rehabilitation, and medicine via a global computer network; Production of radio and television programs; News reporters services; Special event planning; Educational services, namely, a learning and innovation center featuring fully customized leadership, motivational, educational, and brainstorming training; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; Charitable services, namely, providing books to people | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |