Drawing for ENDOSPHERE

USPTO serial 77469786

ENDOSPHERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENDOSPHERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. O'Connell, Jr.

Robert M. O'Connell, Jr. Goodwin Procter LLPExchange Place, 53 State StreetAttn: Trademark AdministratorBoston, MA 02109-2881

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Endoscopy cameras; Rigid and flexible medical endoscopesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 4, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 15, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 15, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 13, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance