Drawing for MYBIZZBOOK.COM

USPTO serial 77470020

MYBIZZBOOK.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWER, MARGARET
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYBIZZBOOK.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric Karich

Julia S. Gard Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing a website that gives computer users the ability to upload and share user generated videos, essays and articles on a wide variety of topics and subjects, not to include financial transaction processing services or products, or the sharing or exchange of financial data; hosting an online community website featuring user-defined information, business information which does not include the provision of financial transaction processing services or products, human resources services, insurance services. benefits services, and bookkeeping services, or the sharing or exchange of financial data, and personal profiles for facilitating business to business, business to person, and person to person social networking and interaction with links between user customized web pages, as well as the websites of othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 1, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 1, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 19, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 9, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 9, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 1, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Oct 19, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 19, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 8, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 25, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 13, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance