USPTO serial 77470256
SMARTBIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTBIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and software downloadable from the Internet directed to the building, building design, architecture, and construction industries, namely, computer software featuring information in the fields of building engineering and building design, architecture and construction; educational software featuring instruction in building engineering and building design, architecture and construction; interactive multimedia computer program for use in designing building structures; virtual reality software for use in the fields of building engineering and building design, architecture and construction; computer software and software downloadable from the Internet for storing, scanning, editing, manipulating and printing information for use in the field of architecture, engineering, civil engineering and industrial architecture and engineering projects; computer software for modeling and visualization of buildings in the field of building engineering and building design, architecture and construction; computer graphics software for use in the fields of building engineering and building design, architecture and construction; computer programs for computer aided drafting applications in connection with the building engineering and building design and architecture fields; computer programs for developing, collecting, editing, organizing, storing and sharing building modeling information for use in the fields of building engineering, construction, design and architecture; computer programs for analyzing and planning the layout of buildings and the design and architecture of buildings; computer software for creating visualizations of multi-dimensional designs in the fields of building engineering and building design and architecture; project management computer software for use in the fields of building engineering and building design and architecture; computer programs for determining the costs of construction products and projects, construction labor costs and the replacement costs of buildings and parts of buildings | ACTIVE | May 13, 2008 |
| 042 | Providing online information via the Internet in the field of residential, industrial and factory building design and architecture; providing an on-line computer database in the field of computer-aided design for others of building information modeling component drawings from multiple manufacturers | ACTIVE | May 13, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |