USPTO serial 77470372
HOCKEY PUCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOCKEY PUCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Ambrogi
John L. Ambrogi PARTRIDGE IP LAW321 North Clark StreetSuite 720CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Frozen confections with flavored coatings and flavored fillings; non-frozen confections in the nature of candy, sweets and biscuits with flavored coatings and flavored fillings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |