USPTO serial 77470410
IMRISMATRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMRISMATRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Manitoba R3T 1N5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie K. Wade
STEPHANIE K. WADE DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 EYE ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-5403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | surgical suite information management systems, namely, computer software and electronic controls that permit the integration and control of equipment utilized in a surgical suite containing a magnetic resonance imaging system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |