CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DAVIS & LAWRENCE D.P. BOOSTER

USPTO serial 77470672

DAVIS & LAWRENCE D.P. BOOSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAVIS & LAWRENCE D.P. BOOSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Kenney

ROBERT J. KENNEY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Veterinary pharmaceutical preparations, namely, vitamin supplements and antibiotics for use in poultry, swine and calvesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 22, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 22, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 31, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jun 6, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 16, 2008TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
May 16, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 13, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance