Drawing for MAGIC GROW

USPTO serial 77470780

MAGIC GROW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGIC GROW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPONE CHASE ROADLACKENBACH SIEGEL BUILDINGSCARSDALE, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Plant growth regulators for horticultural use, namely, soil-less planting medium; fertilizerABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2009MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2009ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 15, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 18, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance