USPTO serial 77470790
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Cary
CATHERINE CARY SUTTON LAW CENTER, PC348 MILL STRENO, NV 89501-1537UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Blended oil; Canola oil; Coconut oil; Coconut oil and fat; Condiments, namely, pepper oil; Cooking oil; Corn oil; Edible oil; Edible oils; Edible oils and edible fats; Edible oils and fats; Hardened oils; Maize oil; Margarine, edible oils and fats; Nutritional oils for food purposes; Oil, namely, vegetable oil, salad oil and edible oils; Oils and fats for food; Olive oil; Olive oil; Olive oils; Palm oil; Peanut oil; Powdered oils and fats; Processed oils and fats; Rice bran oil; Salad oil; Sesame oil; Sesame oil; Soy bean oil; Soybean oil; Soybean oil for cooking; Sunflower oil; Vegetable oils; Vegetable oils and fats; Butter; Butter substitutes; Chocolate nut butter; Cocoa butter for food purposes; Nut butters; Nut butters Almond Butter, Macadamia Nut Butter, Brazil Nut Butter, Pistachio Nut Butter, Cashew Butter, Pumpkin Seed Butter, Hazelnut Butter, Sunflower Seed Butter, Walnut butter, Pecan butter, or any combinations thereof; Peanut butter; Margarine; Margarine substitutes; Jams and marmalades; Marmalade; Marmalades; Marmalades and jams; Non-dairy based mix for making whipped icings and fillings; Non-dairy creamer; Candied fruit; Candied fruit snacks; Crystallized fruit; Crystallized fruits; Dehydrated fruit snacks; Dried fruit and vegetables; Dried fruit mixes; Dried fruits; Dry or aromatized fruit; Fig and date roll consisting of dried fruits, nuts, and spices; Fruit and soy based snack food; Fruit and vegetable salads; Fruit chips; Fruit concentrates and purees used as ingredients of foods; Fruit-based organic food bars; Fruit-based organic food bars, also containing fruits, dried fruits, fruit juice, grains, vegetables, nuts, seeds, chocolate; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit-based spreads; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; Soy-based food bars also containing fruits, dried fruits, fruit juice, grains, vegetables, nuts, seeds, chocolate; Dried vegetables; Vegetable chips; Vegetable puree; Vegetable-based food beverages; Fruit preserves; Fruit purees; Fruit-based food beverage | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |