Drawing for BLUEDRIVE

USPTO serial 77472130

BLUEDRIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUEDRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012AutomobilesACTIVENov 21, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 19, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 16, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 19, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2010CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 3, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 3, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 17, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 17, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 2, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance