Drawing for VICCINO'S

USPTO serial 77472394

VICCINO'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VICCINO'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard E. Steck

RICHARD E. STECK RICHARD E. STECK & ASSOCIATES19 S LASALLE ST STE 602CHICAGO, IL 60603-1435UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Delivery of food by restaurantsACTIVEDec 15, 1998
043Carry-out restaurantsACTIVEDec 15, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 13, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 13, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 29, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 22, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 2, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 2, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 3, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 3, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance