USPTO serial 77472611
RETHINK SWEETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RETHINK SWEETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cookie dough; Cookie mixes; Cookies; Cookies and crackers; Food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies; Fried dough cookies (karintoh); Vegan cookies; Vegan cakes; Vegan cheesecake; Vegan cup cakes; Vegan pies; Cake doughs; Cake mixes; Cakes; Cakes of sugar-bounded millet or popped rice (okoshi); Candy cake decorations; Cup cakes; Edible cake decorations; Edible decorations for cakes; Fruit cakes; Ice-cream cakes; Snack cakes; Sponge cakes; Edible fruit ices; Edible ices; Flavored ices; Frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; Frozen yoghurt; Fruit ice; Fruit ices; Ice candies; Ice cream; Ice cream drinks; Ice cream mixes; Ice cream sandwiches; Ice creams; Iced cakes; Iced coffee; Iced tea; Icing; Italian ice; Muffin mixes; Muffins; Fruit cobblers; Fruit jellies; Fruit pies; Fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; Fruit turnovers; Tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; Bakery desserts; Bakery goods; Bakery products; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods; Mixes for bakery goods; Cereal based snack food; Grain-based snack foods; Granola snacks; Granola-based snack bars; Wheat-based snack foods; Sherbets; Sorbet; Sugar; Sugar and sugar substitutes; Sugar substitutes; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; Processed cereals; Ready-to-eat cereals; Flavored and sweetened gelatins; Flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; Sugarfree sweets; Sweets; Tea; Tea bags; Granola; Coffee; Coffee and tea; Roasted coffee beans; Natural sweetener; Frozen yogurt; Frozen yogurt mixes; Sweetened yogurt covered raisins; Puffed rice; Rice pudding; Rice-based pudding dessert (arroz con leche); Donuts; Candies; Candy; Candy bars; Candy coated apples; Candy coated popcorn; Candy mints; Chocolate candies; Gummy candies; Peppermint candy; Breakfast cereals; Cinnamon rolls; Rolled oats; Chocolate; Chocolate bars; Chocolate chips; Chocolate covered raisins; Chocolate mousse; Chocolate syrup; Chocolate truffles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |