Drawing for METZGERMEISTER A GERMAN TRADITION SINCE 1904

USPTO serial 77473339

METZGERMEISTER A GERMAN TRADITION SINCE 1904

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with METZGERMEISTER A GERMAN TRADITION SINCE 1904?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. Ferrer Perez

PAUL A. FERRER PEREZ GOLDMAN ANTONETTI & CORDOVA250 MUNOZ RIVERA AVE., 14TH FLOORSAN JUAN; PUERTO RICO, PR 00918UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029MeatloafACTIVENov 12, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 2, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2012CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 5, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 5, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 21, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 31, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 20, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 20, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance