USPTO serial 77473956
WIESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig Kirsch, Esq.
Craig Kirsch, Esq. Alcoba & Associates, P.A.3399 NW 72 AvenueSuite 211Miami, FL 33122Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications and networking equipment, software, cables, connectors and systems, namely, local area network access points for connecting network computer users, antennas, transmitters, and receivers for wireless networking data, transceivers, multiplexers, modems, amplifiers, bridges, network switches, routers, firewall software, interface circuits for wireless data processing equipment in the form of printed circuits, operating and driver software for the aforementioned telecommunications and networking equipment, software for enabling the sharing of computer resources, and computer software for managing telecommunications systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |