Drawing for EVALE

USPTO serial 77475088

EVALE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COOPER, CHRISTINE H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVALE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay R. Sherman

KAY R. SHERMAN GALLOP, JOHNSON & NEUMAN, L.C.101 S HANLEY RD STE 1700SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105-3487UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded videotapes and downloadable video and sound recordings in the field of organizational development, conference leadership and religious sermons; electronic publications, namely, booklets, pamphlets and brochures, all in the field of organizational development, conference leadership and sermons, recorded on computer mediaACTIVE—
016Books and printed publications in the nature of instructional booklets, pamphlets and brochures, all in the field of organizational development, conference leadership and sermonsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, classes, workshops, and seminars in the field of organizational development; educational services, namely, classes, workshops, and seminars in the field of executive and leadership development for organizing and presenting business conferencesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2010INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Aug 24, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 21, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance