USPTO serial 77476093
REPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3981854Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 21, 2011
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Energy and Power Solutions, Inc.
Costa Mesa, CA
Energy and Power Solutions, Inc.
Costa Mesa, CA
Energy and Power Solutions, Inc.
Costa Mesa, CA
AMERESCO INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, LLC
FRAMINGHAM, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire
Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and DorrLLP60 State StreetBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Energy management and controlling devices, namely, computer hardware and software used for investigating, diagnosing and metering energy use; carbon emission management and controlling devices, namely, computer hardware and software used for investigating, diagnosing and metering carbon output | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Energy efficiency consultation, namely, consulting services in the field of energy use, management and control | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Rental of energy management and controlling devices, namely, computer hardware and software used for investigating, diagnosing and metering energy use; rental of carbon emission management and controlling devices, namely, computer hardware and software used for investigating, diagnosing and metering carbon output; consulting services in the field of technological environmentally conscious and green innovations for use in carbon emission management and control | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Energy and Power Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Energy and Power Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Energy and Power Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERESCO INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 20, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 9, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |