USPTO serial 77476215
PETER RABBIT ORGANICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PETER RABBIT ORGANICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pasquale A. Razzano
PASQUALE A RAZZANO FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER SCINTO1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104 3800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Organic prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish poultry; Organic meat-based snack foods; Organic nut and seed-based snack bars; Organic meat, fish, poultry, seafood and game and foodstuffs made therefrom, namely, sausages and pate; Organic jellies and dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Organic jams, eggs, milk; Organic edible oils and edible seeds, namely, flax, pumpkin, sunflower and hemp seeds; Organic edible fats and pickles | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Organic prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Organic corn-based snack foods except fresh corn on the cob; Organic rice-based snack foods; Organic granola-based snack bars; Organic processed cereals and cereal-based snack foods; Organic coffee and coffee substitutes, tea, cocoa, rice, tapioca, sago, pasta and food stuffs made from pasta, namely, pasta salad and pasta shells; Organic bread, pastry, cookies, biscuits and bakery products; Organic ice cream and shaved ice confections; Organic non-medicated confectionary, namely, candy, chocolate, and chewing gum; Organic honey; Organic treacle, yeast, baking powder, sauces, spices, salt, mustard, pepper and vinegar; organic sauces, namely, pasta sauce and ketchup | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Organic still water, Organic soda water, Organic mineral and aerated water, Organic nonalcoholic cordials; organic non-alcoholic plant and herb extracts, used in the preparation of beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frederick Warne & Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Frederick Warne & Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PETER RABBIT ORGANICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |