Drawing for YUREEKAH

USPTO serial 77476529

YUREEKAH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with YUREEKAH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward H. Rosenthal

EDWARD H. ROSENTHAL FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ PC488 MADISON AVE FL 10NEW YORK, NY 10022-5754UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing search engines for obtaining and providing data on a global computer network, relating to computers and technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 23, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 17, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 14, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 10, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 4, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 4, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 3, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 21, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 20, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance