USPTO serial 77479316
MAESTRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAESTRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Staten Island, NY
Staten Island, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee Anne LeBlanc
LEE ANNE LEBLANC LAW OFFICE OF LEE ANNE LEBLANC, P.A.1835 E HALLANDALE BEACH BLVD # 344HALLANDALE, FL 33009-4619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Cigars | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |