Drawing for GOOD DEED FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 77479919

GOOD DEED FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOOD DEED FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rita M. Carrier

RITA M. CARRIER SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-5866UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Blood glucose monitors and test strips therefor; blood-pressure monitors; heart monitors; thermometers for medical purposes; droppers for administering medicine, sold empty; nasal aspirators; massage apparatus; electric vibrating massagers; electric foot massagers; therapeutic heating pads; hearing aids; baby bottles; accessories for baby bottles, namely, nipples, disposable liners, and liner holders; pacifiers and teething rings; breast pumps; accessories for breast pumps, namely, structural parts thereof, breast pads, nipple protectors, milk storage containers, namely, bottles and bags; canes for medical purposes; contraceptives in the form of an apparatusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance