Drawing for GOOD DEED FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 77479952

GOOD DEED FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GOOD DEED FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rita M. Carrier

RITA M. CARRIER SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-5866UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Hair dryers for household purposes; hand-held electric hair dryers; shower heads; hand-held showers; electric foot spas for individual consumer use; facial saunas; baby bottle sterilizers and heaters; electric blankets for household purposes; household appliances; grills; warming trays; electric coffee makers; coffee filters not of paper being part of electric coffee makers; electric espresso machines; electric cappuccino machines; electric coffee roasters; electric kettles; electric cooking pots and pans; fondue pots; electric bread cookers; electric griddles; electric hot plates; electric toasters; electric waffle irons; microwave ovens for cooking; electric sandwich makers; electric fryers; electric rice cookers; electric slow cookers; electric pressure cookers; electric toaster ovens; clothes dryers; refrigeration equipment, namely, refrigerators and freezers; wine coolers; ice cream freezers; ice cream makers; cooking ovens; gas stoves; electric stoves; gas ranges; electric ranges; gas cooktops; electric cooktops; induction cooktops; ventilation and exhaust hoods for household use; electric fans; ceiling fans; ventilating exhaust fans; air conditioners; electric space heaters for household use; flashlights; light bulbs; electric lighting fixtures; lamps; lampshades; dehumidifiers; humidifiers; water heaters; household air cleaners; furnaces; water purification units; water softening units; electric frothing machines used for frothing milk; electric lights for Christmas treesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 30, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance