USPTO serial 77479975
GOOD DEED FOUNDATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOOD DEED FOUNDATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita M. Carrier
RITA M. CARRIER SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-5866UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Baby carriers worn on the body; slings for carrying babies; back frames for carrying children; diaper bags; umbrellas; tote bags; handbags; luggage; all-purpose athletic bags; all-purpose carrying bags; attaché cases; backpacks; billfolds; book bags; briefcases; all-purpose cargo bags; coin purses; cosmetic bags sold empty; credit cards cases; daypacks; duffel bags; garment bags for travel; identification cases; identification tags for luggage; key cases; knapsacks; briefcase-type portfolios; purses; rucksacks; satchels; shoulder bags; toiletry cases sold empty; traveling bags; travel organizers; waist pouches; walking sticks; wallets; water bottle carriers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |