Drawing for GOOD DEED FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 77479979

GOOD DEED FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOOD DEED FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rita M. Carrier

RITA M. CARRIER SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-5866UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture; mattresses; mirrors; picture frames; lawn and garden furniture; stools; baby bouncers; baby walkers; seats for babies and children; baby rockers; booster seats; high chairs; covers for high chairs; chair pads; pillows; cushions; playpens and playards; mats for playpens and playards; baby bath seats; cradles; bassinets; cribs; portable cribs; bed guards; baby changing tables; toy boxes and chests; non-metal child safety products, namely, plastic locks for drawers and cabinets, and string and cord winders for use on blinds, curtains, drapes, and window coverings; non-metal safety gates for children; storage and organization products, namely, storage boxes and cabinets of plastic or wood; storage racks; shelvesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance