USPTO serial 77480241
AMERICAN SPRAY COATINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMERICAN SPRAY COATINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CORREY B. AVNER
CORREY B. AVNER AVNER & AVNER11835 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-5001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS AS FORM METALLIC COATING SURFACES ON ARTICLES COMPRISED OF, TILES, GLASS, METAL, PLASTICS, WOOD, GLASS AND/OR CERAMICS; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATIONS OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING METALS IN THE NATURE OF SPRAY MATERIALS FOR ARTICLES COMPRISED OF, TILES, GLASS, METAL, PLASTICS, WOOD, GLASS AND/OR CERAMICS; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR MIRRORS; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR WOOD; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR PLASTICS; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR TILES; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR METAL; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR CERAMICS; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATING SOLUTIONS FOR PORTABILITY, PERMEABILITY AND ENHANCED ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METAL SPRAY COATING MATERIALS; UNDER INTERNATIONAL CLASS 2, VIA SPECIALLY DESIGNED AND DEDICATED SPRAY APPARATUS, NAMELY, SPRAY TIPS, SPRAY GUNS, PUMPS, TUBING, HYDRAULIC COMPONENTS, VALVES, PISTONS, O-RINGS, SPRAY ADAPTERS, AND SPRAY NOZZLES AND SPRAY COMPONENTS, NAMELY, SPRAY TIPS, SPRAY GUNS, PUMPS, TUBING, HYDRAULIC COMPONENTS, VALVES, PISTONS, O-RINGS, SPRAY ADAPTERS; SPRAY APPARATUS SYSTEM, NAMELY SPRAY TIPS, SPRAY GUNS, PUMPS, TUBING, HYDRAULIC COMPONENTS, VALVES, PISTONS, O-RINGS, SPRAY ADAPTERS, AND SPRAY NOZZLES AND SPRAY COMPONENTS, NAMELY SPRAY TIPS, SPRAY GUNS, PUMPS, TUBING, HYDRAULIC COMPONENTS, VALVES, PISTONS, O-RINGS AND SPRAY ADAPTERS; ALL SOLD INTEGRALLY TOGETHER AND WITH PREPARATIONS FOR POST WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE METALLIC COATING MATERIALS WITH UV COATINGS AND CLEAR COATINGS UNDER INTERNATIONAL CLASS 2, (Alternative Re-identification Under Class 2 and Class 7 Applicant believes the above proposed identification under Class 2 alone most apt - particularly in that various central items in the spray hardware system referenced in the proposed re-identification(s) are specially designed so that the spray hardware as used integrally with the surfacing materials will accommodate crucial molecular chemical requirements for the effective application of the preparations to occur. Applicant, however, is mindful and respectful of the suggestion by the Examining Attorney that the Mark may require registration under both Class 2 and Class 7. Accordingly, if the Examining Attorney still finds his suggestion of dual Class 2 and 7 identifications most applicable even after reviewing Attachment A and the elaboration here provided, then Applicant proposes, conditioned on a favorable determination by the Examining Attorney expressing approval to register the instant mark in Class 2 and Class 7 subject to the below alternative re-identification, with the following amendment thereupon proposed: PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR ARTICLES COMPRISED OF, TILES, GLASS, METAL, PLASTICS, WOOD, GLASS AND/OR CERAMICS; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATIONS OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING METALS IN THE NATURE OF SPRAY MATERIALS FOR ARTICLES COMPRISED OF, TILES, GLASS, METAL, PLASTICS, WOOD, GLASS AND/OR CERAMICS; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR MIRRORS; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR WOOD; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR PLASTICS; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR TILES; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR METAL; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATINGS FOR CERAMICS; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METALLIC COATING SOLUTIONS FOR PORTABILITY, PERMEABILITY AND ENHANCED ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY; PREPARATIONS FOR WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE COATING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF METAL SPRAY COATING MATERIALS; PREPARATIONS FOR POST WET APPLICATION OF CHEMICALLY INTERACTIVE METALLIC COATING MATERIALS WITH UV COATINGS AND CLEAR COATINGS, UNDER INTERNATIONAL CLASS 2; AND SPRAY APPARATUS, NAMELY, SPRAY TIPS, SPRAY GUNS, PUMPS, TUBING, HYDRAULIC COMPONENTS, VALVES, PISTONS, O-RINGS, SPRAY ADAPTERS, AND SPRAY NOZZLES AND SPRAY COMPONENTS, NAMELY, SPRAY TIPS, SPRAY GUNS, PUMPS, TUBING, HYDRAULIC COMPONENTS, VALVES, PISTONS, O-RINGS, SPRAY ADAPTERS; SPRAY APPARATUS SYSTEM, NAMELY SPRAY TIPS, SPRAY GUNS, PUMPS, TUBING, HYDRAULIC COMPONENTS, VALVES, PISTONS, O-RINGS, SPRAY ADAPTERS, AND SPRAY NOZZLES AND SPRAY COMPONENTS, NAMELY SPRAY TIPS, SPRAY GUNS, PUMPS, TUBING, HYDRAULIC COMPONENTS, VALVES, PISTONS, O-RINGS AND SPRAY ADAPTERS ALL SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL UNIT UNDER INTERNATIONAL CLASS 7 ) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |