Drawing for THE ORIGINAL CHUBBYS MEXICAN FOOD

USPTO serial 77481121

THE ORIGINAL CHUBBYS MEXICAN FOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ORIGINAL CHUBBYS MEXICAN FOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott T. Kannady

SCOTT T. KANNADY BROWN & KANNADY, LLC2000 S COLORADO BLVD STE 2-610DENVER, CO 80222-7936UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Bar and restaurant servicesACTIVEJun 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 23, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 10, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 11, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 11, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 11, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 14, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 14, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance