USPTO serial 77481211
HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisabeth H. Coakley
LISABETH H. COAKLEY HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.5445 CORPORATE DR STE 200TROY, MI 48098-2683UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Sign holders made of metal; sign holders made of aluminum; sign stands made of metal; signs of metal not luminous or mechanical; traffic and road signs of metal; metal posts; metal hardware, namely anchors, brackets, banding, washers, nuts, buckles, bolts, screws; material handling equipment, namely straps, chains, slings; metal barriers for pedestrian traffic control; crash barriers of metal for roads; metal barricades for pedestrian traffic control; metal security fencing | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Traffic control products and equipment, namely barriers, barricades, barrels, drums, vertical panels, cones, tubes, paddles, warning flags, panels, safety markers, delineators, barricade and sign lights, crash cushions, crash attenuators, arrow boards, arrow panels, message boards, signs, sign stands, speed monitors, traffic signals, barrier walls, radar trailers, work zone lights, vehicle mounted warning lights; air traffic control products and equipment, namely flags; backlit signs; electric signs; luminous signs; neon signs; traffic and roadway signs luminous; sign accessories, namely posts, anchors, brackets, banding, banding tool, buckles, hardware; personal and work safety zone equipment, namely flags, banners, paddles, hard hats, safety glasses, work gloves, safety vests; protective clothing; pavement marking products, namely markers, adhesive, parking curbs, speed bumps, tape, glass beads, stencils, sprays | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | non-luminous, non-mechanical signs not of metal; non-luminous, non-mechanical traffic and roadway signs not of metal; non-metal barriers for pedestrian traffic; barrels, namely, non-metal barriers and barricades for pedestrian traffic control; crash barriers and barrels; concrete walls; water filled walls; non-metal barricades for pedestrian traffic control | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | non-metal holders and stands for signs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Highway Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |