Drawing for THAT'S AMORE

USPTO serial 77481709

THAT'S AMORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THAT'S AMORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen A. Costigan

Kathleen A. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.One Rockefeller Plaza, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Ladies, gents' and children's clothing, namely, shirts, blouses, skirts, jackets, trousers; shorts, vests; jerseys; pajamas; stockings; singlets; clothing corsets; garter belts; pants; bras; petty-coats; slipper; shoe-wear in general, namely, slippers, shoes, sports shoes, boots and sandals; welts for boots and shoes; walking shoes; training shoes; synthetic rubber shoe soles shoes for men; shoes for casual wear; shoes adapted for wear by athletes; running shoes; and shoe inserts of non-metallic materials for primarily non-orthopedic purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 22, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 21, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 24, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 22, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 22, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 21, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 29, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 9, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 21, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 5, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 29, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 30, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance