USPTO serial 77481753
DEADLOCKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEADLOCKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. Magnani
Thomas A. Magnani HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKIN3 EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FL.SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of providing online computer games; providing information about online computer games and video games and enhancements for such games via the Internet; arranging and conducting competitions for video gamers and computer game players; providing multiplayer interactive games provided over the Internet; arranging online competitions for interactive game players; fan clubs; providing training courses, namely, providing training courses, seminars and workshops in the mastery of online computer games and workshops in the field of computer games; organizing community sporting and cultural activities; organizing online community events; organizing online computer events, namely, entertainment exhibitions featuring computer game programs and entertainment exhibitions featuring films or portions thereof, and online interactive games; rental of computer game programs; amusement arcades; amusement parks; amusement centers; digital video, audio and multimedia publishing services; direction and making of radio and television programs; direction and presentation of plays; entertainment in the nature of dance performances; entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of children's entertainment; entertainment in the nature of motion pictures; entertainment in the nature of theater productions; entertainment in the nature of amusement park shows; entertainment in the nature of amusement park rides; entertainment in the nature of amusement park attractions, namely, a themed area; non-downloadable ringtones; pre-recorded music, video, and graphics presented to mobile communications devices via a global computer network of wireless networks; entertainment services, namely providing a website featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring fantasy; providing web casts in the field of fantasy, podcasts in the field of fantasy; film and video production; gambling services; on-line journals, namely blogs featuring fantasy; production and distribution of motion pictures; providing a computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network users; providing on-line card games; providing on-line non-downloadable electronic dictionaries; rental and computerized on-line rental services featuring interactive software and hardware home entertainment and consumer electronics in the nature of motion pictures, audio recordings and video recordings in the fantasy and science fiction genres; theatrical and musical floor shows provided at discotheques and nightclubs; and theatrical and musical floor shows provided at performance venues | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |