USPTO serial 77482230
TANDUO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3915433Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 8, 2011
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TANDUO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
BRUCE S. LONDA NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA875 3RD AVE FL 18NEW YORK, NY 10022-6225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Semiconductor manufacturing machines; Reaction vessels for processing of chemicals used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; CVD (Chemical vapor deposition) machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; Diffusion machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; Oxidation machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; Annealing machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; Heat treatment machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; Etching machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; Washing machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; Epitaxtial growth machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; Physical vapor deposition reaction machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; Ion implantation machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing machines for forming thin film made of semiconductor, metal and insulator; Semiconductor elements manufacturing machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; Semiconductor wafer processing machines used for semiconductor and integrated circuit manufacturing; Integrated circuit manufacturing machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named TANDUO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |