USPTO serial 77482613
VALCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VALCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VERCHERES, QUEBEC, CA
VERCHERES, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence J McAllister
TERRENCE J MCALLISTER OHLANDT GREELEY RUGGIERO & PERLE LLP1 LANDMARK SQFL 10STAMFORD, CT 06901-2619Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Thermoplastic orthotic braces, casts and splinting material; compression burn garments; ostomy belts; Medical compression stockings and tights; medical body limb compression sleeves and garments; Medical hosiery, namely, support socks; Hosiery, namely, diabetic socks; Pillow forms, namely, positioning pillows, modules and wedges for medical use; Orthopedic supports, namely, braces, corsets, cervical collars and orthopedic appliances, and also mechanical prosthesis for all parts of the body | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of medical compression stockings, tights, body limb compression sleeves and garments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by J. VAILLANCOURT CORP. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by J. VAILLANCOURT CORP. LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named VALCO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |