USPTO serial 77482692
KICK INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KICK INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald W. Hind
RONALD W. HIND POLSTER, LIEDER, WOODRUFF & LUCCHESI, L.12412 POWERSCOURT DR STE 200SAINT LOUIS, MO 63131-3615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | TELEVISION PRODUCTION SERVICES FOR PROGRAMS IN THE SPORT OF KICK BOXING AND RELATED MARTIAL ARTS; ORGANIZING KICK BOXING AND RELATED MARTIAL ARTS CONTESTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |