USPTO serial 77482855
REFRACT-X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3779938Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 27, 2010
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REFRACT-X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue 10th FloorNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fiber optic apparatus, namely, optical data links, cable television transmitters, digital transmitters; active and passive fiber optic apparatus used for the transmission and reception of audio, video and data signals in communication networks, namely, optical transmitters, optical receivers, optical transceivers, cables for optical signal transmission, fiber optic couplings, fiber-optic transceivers, fiber-optic repeaters; optical splitters; optical patchcords, optical pig-tails; optical filters; optical multiplexers; optical demultiplexers; single-mode and multi-mode optical couplers; optical adapters; fiber optic nodes; wave division multiplexers; optical connectors; optical cable assemblies; optical terminators; optical patch panels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications consulting, namely, provision of advice relating to telecommunications components used in broadband networks, passive networks and customer installations connected to such networks and security systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Telecommunications technology consulting, namely, provision of advice relating to telecommunications components used in broadband networks, passive networks and customer installations connected to such networks and security systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Technetix Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Technetix Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Technetix Group Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REFRACT-X
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |