Drawing for INVUE PODS

USPTO serial 77483781

INVUE PODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INVUE PODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher C. Dremann

CHRISTOPHER C. DREMANN CHRISTOPHER C. DREMANN, P.C.15015 LANCASTER HIGHWAYCHARLOTTE, NC 28277UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic security devices for protecting retail merchandise from theft, namely, electronic security fixtures for use in retail stores being garment alarms, line alarms, free standing alarm modules, alarm module stands, and cabinet alarmsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 1, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 1, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 1, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 5, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 13, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 30, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance