USPTO serial 77484243
RUGGED WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2011
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RUGGED WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Filip A. Kowalewski
Filip A. Kowalewski Siemens Corporation3501 Quadrangle Boulevard, Suite 230Orlando, FL 32817UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for operating and/or managing, namely, for monitoring performance characteristics and physical connections of a computer network; computer software for operating and/or managing, namely, for managing and visualizing the performance of a computer network; computer network communication routers, Ethernet switches and computer switches, gateway routers for use with communication networks, computers and modems; fiber optic cables, connectors and filters; fiber optical Ethernet networks comprised of hubs, switches and fiber-to-electrical media converters, communication hubs, communication routers, and switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; computer network hubs, switches and routers having fiber optical ports; computer network hubs, routers and switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media pods; fiber optical Ethernet networks comprised of hubs, switches, fiber-to-electrical media converters, serial to Ethernet communication servers, communication hubs, communication routers, computer hubs, computer network routers, switches and serial to Ethernet communication servers having mixed fiber optic to electrical media pods; computer network hubs, switches and routers having optical ports; computer network hubs, routers, switches, serial to Ethernet communication servers and serial device communication servers having mixed fiber optic and copper ports; video encoders; fiber optic to cable converters; fiber optical to electrical media converters; serial to Ethernet network gateways; serial device communication servers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications equipment, namely, switches, routers, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, communication hubs, fiber-to-electrical media converters, computer hubs, Ethernet servers, serial device servers; computerized on-line retail store services featuring fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications equipment, namely, switches, routers, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, communication hubs, fiber-to-electrical media converters, computer hubs, Ethernet servers, serial device servers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Monitoring of the computer network systems of others for technical purposes; diagnostic services for computer network systems, computer network design for others; computer network consulting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUGGEDCOM INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RUGGEDCOM INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RUGGEDCOM INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SIEMENS CANADA LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RUGGED WIRELESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |