USPTO serial 77484369
ILOUNGE ORANGE COUNTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ILOUNGE ORANGE COUNTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher K. Jafari
CHRISTOPHER K. JAFARI LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER K. JAFARI1 PARK PLZ STE 600IRVINE, CA 92614-5987UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services; Booking of catering services for others; Cafe and restaurant services; Cafe-restaurants; Cafeteria and restaurant services; Carry-out restaurants; Catering; Catering for the provision of food and beverages; Catering in fast-food cafeterias; Catering of food and drinks; Cocktail lounges; Delicatessens; Fast food and non-stop restaurant services; Fast-food restaurants; Fast-food restaurants and snackbars; Hotel and restaurant reservation services; Hotel and restaurant services; Hotel, bar and restaurant services; Hotel, motel, restaurant, bar and catering services; Hotel, restaurant and bar services; Hotel, restaurant and catering services; Ice cream shop services in the nature of a restaurant; Private residence club services, namely, provision to club members of temporary accommodations in company owned or leased private residences; Providing a web site featuring a searchable collection of alcoholic and non-alcoholic cocktail recipes; Providing advice to tourists and business travelers on hotel and restaurant destinations; Providing an interactive web site in the field of recipes for alcoholic beverages and cocktail; Providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; Providing community centers for social gatherings and meetings; Providing on-line reviews of restaurants and hotels; Providing progressive dinner events where participants sample meals and drinks at a series of restaurants; Providing reviews of restaurants; Provision of food and drink in restaurants; Rental of tableware, silverware, dishes, and table accessories for special events; Reservation of restaurants; Restaurant; Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant and cafe services; Restaurant and catering services; Restaurant and hotel services; Restaurant services; Restaurant services featuring sandwiches; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Restaurant, bar and catering services; Restaurants; Restaurants featuring home delivery; Self service restaurants; Self-service restaurants; Take-out restaurant services; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for restaurants and meals | ACTIVE | May 5, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |