Drawing for LAPID FOODS

USPTO serial 77485275

LAPID FOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAPID FOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed meats, namely, beef, pork, turkey, chicken; Pork rinds; Sausages; Corned beef; Processed seafood; processed fruitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 27, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 22, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 16, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 14, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 7, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 8, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 17, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance