Drawing for MOVIEWEEK

USPTO serial 77485328

MOVIEWEEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOVIEWEEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gene S. Winter

GENE S. WINTER ST. ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS LLC986 BEDFORD STREETSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5619UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING TRADE SHOWS RELATING TO THE OPERATION OF MOVIE THEATRES, CONCESSIONS AND FILM MARKETING FOR MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 27, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 6, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2011GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 24, 2011GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 24, 2011CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 25, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 4, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 14, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 7, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 7, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 8, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 8, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 14, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 14, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 31, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance