Drawing for ADVICEYARD

USPTO serial 77485386

ADVICEYARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVICEYARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Teresa Lee

Teresa Lee Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Internet browser plug-ins and client server applications in the nature of multi-function tool bar plug-ins; computer software for use in providing search engine services which are provided through a browser tool bar; computer software for use in organizing and syndicating RSS feeds for personal use; computer software for use in a web application enabling uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing audio and video recordings, electronic media or information over the Internet or other communications network; computer software development tools for social and professional networking, building social and professional networking applications and for allowing data retrieval, upload, access, and management; application programming interface (API) software used to create and manage third party software and online services for social and professional networkingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 30, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance