Drawing for MXM

USPTO serial 77485552

MXM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MXM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David S. D'Ascenzo

DAVID S. D'ASCENZO DASCENZO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.522 SW 5TH AVENUESUITE 925PORTLAND, OR 97204-2126

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007automotive intake and exhaust systems and parts therefor, namely, pipes, manifolds, and headers in the nature of replacement parts for land vehicles; and superchargers in the nature of replacement parts for land vehiclesACTIVE—
012land vehicles; vehicle wheels in the nature of replacement parts for land vehicles; automotive interiors, namely, seat covers, console parts, soft trim, headliners, and paneling in the nature of replacement parts for land vehicles; and automotive exteriors, namely, hood mounted air intake scoops, fender mounted air exhaust vents, grills, and decorative trim; excluding tires, tubes for vehicle wheels, treads for recapping tires, and tracks for tracked land vehiclesACTIVE—
037automobile customization; automotive conversion services, namely, installing specialty automotive equipment; custom rebuilding of existing land vehicles and structural parts thereof; automotive refinishingACTIVE—
040custom building of land vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance