USPTO serial 77485773
THE MOVIE MAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE MOVIE MAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Oshinsky
PO BOX 351510LOS ANGELES, CA 90035-9210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment and education services, namely, providing news, reviews and other information and opinions regarding movies, television shows, live theater, live and recorded musical performances, online entertainment, video games and other entertainment-related topics via television, radio, the Internet, cellular phones, wireless devices and other electronic means | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leatherman, Russ
- Other trademarks owned by Six Second Reviews, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Leatherman, Russ
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE MOVIE MAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |