Drawing for BECKER FURNITURE WORLD

USPTO serial 77485896

BECKER FURNITURE WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BECKER FURNITURE WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles E. Golla

GREGORY C. GOLLA MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail store services in the field of furniture, home furnishings, and rugs, window treatments, gas fireplaces, paint, flooring and sinks, bathtubs, showers, and toiletsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 20, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 20, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 7, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 16, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 12, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 5, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 5, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 2, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 2, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 2, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance