USPTO serial 77486594
EPOVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPOVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORI M. LOFSTROM
LORI M. LOFSTROM HOLMES & LOFSTROM, LLP3800 KILROY AIRPORT WAY STE 250LONG BEACH, CA 90806-2497UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Internet phones and video phones | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2008 |
| 035 | Franchising and business services, namely, photocopying services; lease and rental of copy machines; photocopying, reproducing and compiling documents for others; and rental of office machinery and equipment | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2008 |
| 036 | Electronic transfer of money | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2008 |
| 038 | Communication services, namely, providing access to the internet; electronic mail services; VOIP services, electronic transmission of data, documents and photographs via the internet through use of computer terminals; facsimile transmission services and video/voice teleconferencing; rental of telephone, facsimile and video teleconferencing equipment | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2008 |
| 041 | Digital imaging services, namely, photography; and computer services, namely, providing computer-based games that may be accessed network-wide by network users | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E-BRIDGE INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EPOVO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |