USPTO serial 77486891
KLIVEMTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KLIVEMTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Södertälje, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wm. Charles Saunders
WM. CHARLES SAUNDERS ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP1800 CONCORD PIKE # OW2WILMINGTON, DEUNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of diseases and disorders of the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, respiratory and nervous systems; Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of pain, inflammation and infection; Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of cancer, diabetes, obesity, and psychiatric and neurological diseases and disorders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |