USPTO serial 77487119
AMERISTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERISTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Dietrich
William H. Dietrich Slater & Matsil, LLP17950 Preston RoadSuite 1000Dallas, TX 75252Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Window blinds and window coverings, namely, vertical and horizontal louvers, Venetian blinds, mini window blinds, wooden window blinds, pleated window shades, cellular window shades | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair, replacement installation, and installation services of window blinds and window coverings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | PWFM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |