USPTO serial 77487344
ONCOLOGY PHARMACY NEWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONCOLOGY PHARMACY NEWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shannon Hennessy Pulaski
Shannon Hennessy Pulaski THE LAW OFFICE OF SHANNON HENNESSY PULASKI, LLC1601 Perrineville Road #7337MONROE TOWNSHIP, NJ 08831UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications | ACTIVE | Mar 21, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Michael J. Hennessy & Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLISPHERE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLISPHERE, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ONCOLOGY PHARMACY NEWS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2021 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |