Drawing for E HUNT GEAR

USPTO serial 77487515

E HUNT GEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E HUNT GEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Oliver R. Chernin

OLIVER R. CHERNIN OLIVER R. CHERNIN1 MCCREA LNDARIEN, CT 06820-5902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Mail order services featuring hunting apparel, sporting apparel, hunting goods, and sporting goods; On-line retail store services featuring hunting apparel, sporting apparel, hunting goods, and sporting goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 8, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 8, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 23, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 6, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 6, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 7, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 7, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance