Drawing for JETBLUE HAPPY JETTING

USPTO serial 77488530

JETBLUE HAPPY JETTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JETBLUE HAPPY JETTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph F. Nicholson, Esq.

JOSEPH F. NICHOLSON, ESQ. KENYON & KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043providing travel lodging information services and travel lodging booking agency services for travelers; providing catering of foods and drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 18, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 28, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 28, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 28, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 1, 2008PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
Sep 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance